Coronavirus (COVID-19)

We're here to help you with your learning during the COVID-19 lockdown.   |   Our flexible evidence approach enables students to meet requirements for the Education and Training qualifications.   |   Sign up to our mailing list to get access to exclusive offers! 

Coronavirus (COVID-19)

We're here to help you with your learning during the COVID-19 lockdown.   |   Our flexible evidence approach enables students to meet requirements for the Education and Training qualifications.   |   Sign up to our mailing list to get access to exclusive offers! 

Honey and Mumford Learning Styles

Honey and Mumford Learning Styles

171975 views | Ruby | 08-01-2017

Honey and Mumford's learning styles were developed by Peter Honey and Alan Mumford in 1986. Their work is inspired by and built upon Kolb’s learning styles model (Leaver, 2005). however, they produced their own Learning Styles Questionnaire (LSQ) because it was found that Kolb’s LSI had low validity with managers.

Therefore instead of asking people directly how they learn, as Kolb’s LSI does, Honey and Mumford gave a questionnaire that probes general behavioural tendencies. The rationale behind this is that most people have never consciously considered how they really learn. And to be an effective learner, individuals must know about their learning styles or preferences and find ways to learn using those methods.

To help with finding the correct learning style or preference, Honey and Mumford have developed a questionnaire built on a continuum as the figure shows below. Knowing your learning style helps individuals to make smarter decisions in adjusting the learning opportunities and your preference of best learning, increases the range and variety of experiences which are potential learning opportunities, improves learning skills and awareness (Zwanenberg, 2016). We'd recommend that you learn more about Learning Difficulties in Classroom as a part of your Continuous Professional Development.

Learning styles:

The four learning styles are (Mobbs, 2010):

Activists: Activists are those individuals who learn by doing. Activists need to get their hands filthy. They have a receptive way to deal with learning, including themselves completely and without inclination in new encounters. The learning activities can be brainstorming, problem-solving, group discussion, puzzles, competitions, role-play, etc

Theorists: These learners get a kick out of the chance to comprehend the hypothesis behind the activities. They require models, ideas and truths with a specific end goal to participate in the learning procedure. Like to break down and integrate, drawing new data into a methodical and consistent ‘hypothesis’. Their choice of learning activities includes models, statistics, stories, quotes, background information, applying concepts theoretically etc.

Pragmatists: These individuals have the capacity to perceive how to put the learning into practice in their present reality. Conceptual ideas and recreations are of constrained utility unless they can see an approach to put the concepts practically in their lives. Experimenting with new ideas, speculations and methods to check whether they work is their mode of action. They learn better through taking time to think about how to apply learning in reality, case studies, problem-solving and discussion.

Reflectors: These individuals learn by watching and contemplating what happened. They may abstain from jumping in and prefer to watch from the sidelines. They want to remain back and see encounters from various alternate points of view, gathering information and using the opportunity to work towards a suitable conclusion. They like paired discussions, self-analysis questionnaires, personality questionnaires, time out, observing activities, feedback from others. coaching, interviews etc.

Another survey by Peter Honey did not reveal any particular ‘e-learning styles’, although as a result of his research he speculated that ‘Activists’ (those with an open-minded approach to learning and wish to involve themselves fully in the experience) would want the pace to be faster and the chunks of time to be shorter than ‘reflectors’ (those that prefer to stand back and view experiences from a number of different perspectives first).

He also suggests that Activists might find it more difficult to motivate themselves and find time to complete the tasks than ‘Theorists’ (who like to analyse and synthesise, drawing new information into a systematic and logical theory) and ‘Pragmatists’ (experimenters, who try out new ideas and techniques to see if they will work) who are likely to be more disciplined and better at planning it into their schedules. Time management skills are particularly important for effective online study.

He also suggests that Activists might find it more difficult to motivate themselves and find time to complete the tasks than ‘Theorists’ (who like to analyse and synthesise, drawing new information into a systematic and logical theory) and ‘Pragmatists’ (experimenters, who try out new ideas and techniques to see if they will work) who are likely to be more disciplined and better at planning it into their schedules. Time management skills are particularly important for effective online study.

Resources:

Anon, (2016). [online]

Honey, P. & Mumford, A. (1982) Manual of Learning Styles London: P Honey

Leaver, B. (2005). Learning styles and learning strategies (Chapter 3) – Achieving Success in Second Language Acquisition. [online] Cambridge Core.

Mobbs, D. (2010). Honey and Mumford — University of Leicester. [online]

Pd-how2.org. (2016). Learning styles. [online]

Zwanenberg, N. (2016). Felder and Silverman’s Index of Learning Styles and Honey and Mumford’s Learning Styles Questionnaire: How do they compare and do they predict academic performance?: Educational Psychology: Vol 20, No 3. [online]

TAGS: honey-and-mumford-learning-styles

Share this Post

Related Articles

  • Reversing Autism: The Nemechek Protocol

    Reversing Autism: The Nemechek Protocol

    Reversing Autism and its effects are not known to all. Most people agree that there is no cure for autism and so they approach Autism Spectrum Disorder in a way that looks at the management of symptoms or development of skills and supports through behavioural and educational therapy.

  • Thinking Style: What are the Five Thinking Styles?

    Thinking Style: What are the Five Thinking Styles?

    Thinking style is the way of processing information. It involves organising thoughts, forming views and opinions and applying personal values to solve problems and make decisions to express oneself to others.

    We employ different ways of thinking that ranges from some learners taking a creative approach and others adopting an analytical one. While all learners are different and have unique minds, our tendencies are summed up into five recognised thinking styles: synthesists, idealists, pragmatists, analyst or problem solvers. 

Comments (0)